Article Highlights

Key Takeaway:

U.S. transit agency CapMetro released its cost analysis and independent cost estimate for the emergency replacement of its fare system. The analysis concluded that a new system from Cubic would be cheaper than the market but offers little detail about how it arrived at its estimate.

Key Data:

• Document: CapMetro cost analysis, July 2024

Organizations Mentioned:

• CapMetro (Austin, Texas)
• Cubic
• Siemens Mobility/Bytemark

Texas transit agency Capital Metro stated in an “independent cost estimate” that the emergency fare-system replacement it is buying from Cubic Transportation Systems would cost it less than a similar system the agency could procure on the market. It does not, however, say how it arrived at the estimate for the higher-priced fare system.

An eight-page cost analysis and independent cost estimate (download below), obtained by Mobility Payments, stated that Cubic could replace CapMetro’s existing fare system for a total $5.78 million for

Subscription Required

This premium content is only available to subscribers

Article has about828words.

To keep reading, subscribe today

Get access to premium content from the only global publication devoted exclusively to mobility payments by subscribing today to the most authoritative source for news and analysis in the industry.

Already a member? Log in here