Article Highlights
The Utah Transit Authority received responses from eight vendors to its request for proposal for a new fare system, with five of the vendors submitting lower cost bids than the vendor the authority ended up choosing for the contract, documents obtained by Mobility Payments show.
• Table: UTA Tender–Rank of Bidders
• Table: UTA Price Bids-Breakdown
• Evaluation Score Sheet
• UTA (Utah)
• Scheidt & Bachmann
• Masabi
• Bytemark
• Vix
• Moovel
• Cubic
• INIT
• Access-IS
• Modeshift
The Utah Transit Authority received responses from eight vendors to its request for proposal for a new fare system, with five of the vendors submitting lower cost bids than the vendor the authority ended up choosing for the contract, documents obtained by Mobility Payments show.
Subscription Required
This premium content is only available to subscribers
Article has about1614words.
To keep reading, subscribe today
Get access to premium content from the only global publication devoted exclusively to mobility payments by subscribing today to the most authoritative source for news and analysis in the industry.
